Mon Dec 28 09:59:18 UTC 2009  pix@kepibu.org
  * Minor syntactic changes
  To make more modern org-modes happy.  Woo.
diff -rN -u old-Oh, Ducks!/notes new-Oh, Ducks!/notes
--- old-Oh, Ducks!/notes	2015-12-19 18:33:38.000000000 +0000
+++ new-Oh, Ducks!/notes	2015-12-19 18:33:38.000000000 +0000
@@ -19,18 +19,18 @@
 HTML/XML parsing library such as cxml or closure-html.
 
 Start with:
-  :(asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :oh-ducks)
+: (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :oh-ducks)
 If you would like to use the built-in support for parsing via
 closure-html (which you almost certainly do), you'll also want to load
 closure-html:
-  :(asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :closure-html)
+: (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :closure-html)
 And, if you want to use DOM objects provided by cxml:
-  :(asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :cxml)
+: (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :cxml)
 ** Load-order Caveats
 closure-html and cl-unification each define competing readers on #t.
 To avoid load-order issues resulting in an indeterminate reader on #t,
 you'll probably want to add
- :#.(set-dispatch-macro-character #\# #\T 'unify::|sharp-T-reader|)
+: #.(set-dispatch-macro-character #\# #\T 'unify::|sharp-T-reader|)
 to the top of any file which uses cl-unification's reader templates.
 
 Please feel free to submit patches to closure-html and cl-unification
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
 whichever library provides your desired object model and parser.
 
 For example,
-  :depends-on (:oh-ducks :closure-html :cxml)
+: :depends-on (:oh-ducks :closure-html :cxml)
 
 * Usage
 The combination of oh-ducks and closure-html provides an HTML template
@@ -162,10 +162,10 @@
 ** Submit patch to closure-html to add (enable/disable-reader) functions
 ** non-css templates (e.g., for matching on text of element)?
 Maybe special-case string/regexp-templates, so for example
-  #t(html ("div" (#t(regexp "f(o+)bar") . ?div)))
+: #t(html ("div" (#t(regexp "f(o+)bar") . ?div)))
 would match [<div>foooobar</div>]?
 
-  #t(html ("div" . #t(regexp "f(o+)bar" (?o))))
+: #t(html ("div" . #t(regexp "f(o+)bar" (?o))))
 might cause some difficulty, however--we should get a list of matched elements
 for the div selector, but the regexp variable (?o) can only match once (without
 some wacky environment merging, anyway).